A Systematic Review of Intervention Trials Utilizing Biomarkers Among Informal Caregivers of People with Alzheimer's Disease & Related Dementias.

Informal caregivers of people with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) experience unique stressors, reduced quality of life, and report poorer health, compared to non-caregivers. Throughout the last thirty years, researchers have developed and tested various psychosocial interventions and their ability to improve caregiver health. Due to an exclusive focus on self-report methods, however, no existing systematic literature reviews specifically examine intervention studies employing biomarkers; this systematic review aims to address this gap in the literature. In each database (PubMed and Web of Science, respectively), a title search was conducted with the following keywords: "alzheimer*" OR "dementia" AND "caregiv*" AND "intervention", followed by a second search using identical keywords except "intervention" was replaced with "program." Study or intervention protocol articles, exclusively qualitative studies, cultural applicability papers, dissemination studies, descriptive articles or program reports, acceptability/feasibility studies, studies utilizing formal caregiving samples, commentaries, review papers, and meta-analyses, erratums/corrections, measure development articles, factor analyses, and case reports were excluded from the final pool of studies. In this systematic review, the findings of 14 studies are summarized, and are organized based on specific types of biomarkers: neuroendocrine, immune, and autonomic physiological. Overall, the review yielded mixed results, which may, in part, be due to differences in the types of interventions tested, as well as differing biomarker measurement, methodology, and analysis. More biobehavioral intervention trials are needed among ADRD caregivers. Including biological parameters as pre- and post-measures can shed insight into the extent to which interventions may help caregivers heal from the stress of caregiving.

Empowered Choices: African-American Women's Breast Reconstruction Decisions.

Objectives: Breast reconstruction (BR) potentially can improve quality of life in postmastectomy breast cancer survivors (BCS); however, African-American women are less likely to undergo BR than Caucasian women. This qualitative study was undertaken to explore individual, sociocultural, and contextual factors influencing African-American women's BR decision-making processes and preferences. Methods: Postmastectomy African-American BCS with and without BR participated in semi-structured interviews. We adopted a grounded theory approach using the constant comparison method to understand the contexts and processes informing participants' BR decision-making. Results: Twenty-three women participated, of whom 17 elected BR and 6 did not. Whereas women's primary reasons for deciding for or against BR differed, our core category, "empowered choices ," describes both groups' decision-making as a process focused on empowering themselves physically and/or psychologically, through self-advocacy, informed and shared decision-making, and giving back/receiving communal and spiritual support from church and African-American survivor groups. Socioeconomic factors influenced women's access to BR. Women preferred autologous BR and expressed the need for greater culturally-matched resources and support to inform treatment and shared BR decision-making. Conclusions: Understanding and supporting African-American women's BR preferences and empowerment is essential to ensuring equal access, and culturally-relevant, high-quality, and informed patient-centered care.

Protective Factors to the Wellbeing of Undocumented Latinx Immigrants in the United States: A Socio-Ecological Approach.

Undocumented immigrants often experience multiple chronic stressors that over time can increase health risk. This qualitative study used data from 7 focus groups and 15 key informant interviews to identify relevant protective factors to the heath of undocumented immigrants in the U.S. Findings showed that at the individual level, undocumented immigrants rely primarily on motivation to cope with adversity, while also relying on family support and community cohesion at the interpersonal level. At the policy level, safe neighborhoods and non-stigmatizing environments, protection from abuse/exploitation, and activism were identified as protective factors. English proficiency was also identified as important.